Content begins here
Main page content
Click to collapse
Teachers can use the following rubrics to evaluate the work of their students and give them feedback about it. Teachers must rate each specific criterion on a scale from 1 to 5, according to the degree of compliance in which 5 corresponds to full compliance and 1 indicates non-compliance. To get the final assessment, the rate of each criterion is converted to points and all points are added, getting a final number of points. A minimum of 13 points is required.
- Rubrics to valuate the characterization of the chosen natural or cultural heritage
- Rubrics to evaluate the script of the multimedia
- Rubrics to evaluate the photos
- Rubrics to evaluate the recorded voice and chosen music
- Rubrics to evaluate the edition of the project
Once the multimedia is finished, teachers should use the following rubrics to evaluate it and to guarantee that all the requirements to be uploaded to O-City World platform are met. Teachers must rate each specific criterion on a scale from 1 to 5, according to the degree of compliance in which 5 corresponds to full compliance and 1 indicates non-compliance. To get the final assessment, the rate of each criterion is converted to points and all points are added, getting a final number of points. The multimedia must get more than 35 points to be uploaded to O-City World platform.
|
TAG |
SPECIFIC CRITERIA |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
Assessment |
Comments |
|
|
|
1 |
Heritage characterization |
The patrimonial element is correctly characterized and explained. The script is not overloaded with information and messages are presented objectively. |
X |
1 |
|
|||||
|
2 |
Shot quality |
The number of photos is correct and the lighting, the technical and compositional quality is adequate. |
X |
2 |
|
|||||
|
3 |
Locution time and understandability |
The locution time is correct and the reading speed of the script is adequate, as well as the understanding and transmission of the message. |
X |
1 |
|
|||||
|
4 |
Music |
Background music is correctly selected, its volume is adequate and it does not compete with the audio of the speech. |
X |
4 |
|
|||||
|
5 |
Sound quality |
The recording of the ambient sound, if any, and the interior recording of the script reading are correctly recorded; no wind or noise affecting the audio. Sound elements are heard properly. |
X |
1 |
|
|||||
|
6 |
Photo edition |
The images are correctly edited, without cropping or filters that affect their original quality. |
X |
1 |
|
|||||
|
7 |
Resource combination |
The duration of each photo is correct and coincides with the section of the technical script in its description. It is not excessive. |
X |
2 |
|
|||||
|
8 |
Synchronization |
The background music and the audio of the script's speech are synchronized on the timeline. The volumes have been adjusted for the correct transmission of the message. |
X |
1 |
|
|||||
|
9 |
Duration |
The duration of the audio-visual project is adequate. The sequences of the technical script are differentiated by the corresponding intonation and pauses. |
X |
1 |
|
|||||
|
10 |
Subtitles |
Subtitles are synchronized with the audio of the speech; pre-set font, size and colour have been used. |
X |
1 |
|
|||||
|
11 |
Start and End |
Logos and credits are correct and centred on the white background. The type of font, size and colour used in the credits is adequate. |
X |
1 |
|
|||||
|
|
|
Total: 11 (Accepted: 36-55 points; Rejected: 11-35 points) |
15 |
|||||||